|
Death by Dust
The frightening link between the 9-11 toxic cloud and cancer
by Kristen Lombardi
November 28th, 2006 5:22 PM
To date, 75 recovery workers at ground zero have been diagnosed with blood
cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors and epidemiologists have
confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure.
It was October 6, 2004, three years after Ernie Vallebuona's three-month
stint as a rescue and recovery worker at ground zero in the wake of the
9-11 terrorist attacks, and he was hunched over and trembling, racked by a
pain like nothing he had experienced in his 40 years of sound health. He
had just returned to his Rockland County home after finishing the
midnight-to-8 a.m. shift in the NYPD vice unit, where he'd reported to
work for the last six years. Vallebuona had bought some fish from a street
vendor near his office, on the Lower East Side. And as he drove the 35
miles from Manhattan to New City, he chalked up a searing stomachache to
food poisoning. Maybe the vendor had filleted that fish with a dirty
machete?
By the time he pulled into his driveway, the pain had grown excruciating,
too horrible
for him to even lie in bed that day. The chills swept over his body; so
did the shakes. He called his doctor, who suggested ulcer medication. His
mother advised him to forget that diagnosis and consult a specialist
instead, but like a lot of young, healthy
men, he didn't listen right away.
Vallebuona isn't much for complaining; what ailing cop is? But for six
months, he had noticed his body betraying him. His toes had reddened; his
joints had stiffened. They throbbed in prickly pangs, as if glass shards
were wedged underneath his skin. When his own heartbeat began to hurt, he
had visited the family doctor, who diagnosed him with gout. He was told to
drink cherry juice and take anti-inflammatory medicine. Neither worked.
Now as his stomach convulsed, Vallebuona listened to his mother at last.
Later that day, he found himself at a gastroenterologist's office in
Pomona, lying on a table, watching a nurse poke at his abdomen. She felt a
lump and ordered tests. It would take a month to reach a definitive
diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphoid tissue.
Evidently, Vallebuona had developed a golf-ball-sized mass in his abdomen
that had grown so fast and so quick that pieces of it were dying and
depositing into his blood, causing gout-like symptoms.
One week after that, he was at a Manhattan hospital, meeting his
oncologist, hearing about the heavy-duty chemotherapy he would have to
undergo over the next four months. At the visit, a nurse explained he had
an aggressive cancer—a rare stage-three—and asked a battery of questions.
Did he ever do modeling with glue? Did he ever handle insecticides? Did he
ever work with chemicals like benzene?
Vallebuona answered no to all the questions. He had led a clean life;
before becoming a cop, he'd worked in a bank.
Sitting in the examining room with him, Vallebuona's wife, Amy, finally
spoke up.
"What about 9-11?" she asked. "What about all that smoke and dust?"
Only then did Ernie Vallebuona first consider the possibility that the
events of September 11 could be the cause of his cancer.
This is not the story of rescue and recovery workers at ground zero
getting sick with respiratory illnesses from their exposure; you have read
those stories, and you have heard those cases.
This is the story of 9-11 and cancer.
To date, 75 recovery workers on or around what is now known as "the
Pile"—the rubble that remained after the World Trade Center towers
collapsed on the morning of September 11, 2001—have been diagnosed with
blood cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors and epidemiologists have
confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure.
Those 75 cases have come to light in joint-action lawsuits filed against
New York City on behalf of at least 8,500 recovery workers who suffer from
various forms of lung illnesses and respiratory diseases—and suggest a
pattern too distinct to ignore. While some cancers take years, if not
decades, to develop, the blood cancers in otherwise healthy and young
individuals represent a pattern that experts believe will likely prove to
be more than circumstantial. The suits seek to prove that these 8,500
workers—approximately 20 percent of the total estimated recovery force
that cleared the rubble from ground zero—all suffer from the debilitating
effects of those events.
The basis for the suits stems from the plaintiffs' argument that the
government—in a desperate attempt to revive downtown in the wake of the
catastrophic events on 9-11—failed to protect workers from cancer-causing
benzene, dioxin, and other hazardous chemicals that permeated the air for
months. Officials made these failures worse by falsely reassuring New
Yorkers that they faced no long-term dangers from exposure to the air
lingering over ground zero.
"We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of
air-quality and drinking-water conditions in both New York and near the
Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to
excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances," Christine Todd
Whitman, the then administrator of the EPA, told the citizens of New York
City in a press release on September 18—only seven days after the attacks.
"Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the
people of New York . . . that their air is safe to breathe and the water
is safe to drink."
Those statements were not only false and misleading, but may even play
into the basis for the city's liability for millions of dollars in the
recovery workers' lawsuits. Last February, U.S. District Judge Deborah
Batts cited Whitman's false statements as the basis for allowing a
different class-action lawsuit to proceed—this one, against the EPA and
Whitman, is on behalf of residents, office workers, and students from
Lower Manhattan and Brooklyn, many of whom suffer from respiratory
illnesses as a result of 9-11.
"No reasonable person would have thought that telling thousands of people
that it was safe to return to Lower Manhattan, while knowing that such
return could pose long-term health risks and other dire consequences, was
conduct sanctioned by our laws," Batts wrote in her February 2 ruling.
"Whitman's deliberate and misleading statements made to the press, where
she reassured the public that the air was safe to breathe around Lower
Manhattan and Brooklyn, and that there would be no health risk presented
to those returning to the areas, shocks the conscience."
And that was before anyone knew of the apparent cancer link, first
reported in the New York news media in the spring of 2004. Even more
shocking is the incidence of cancer and other life-threatening illnesses
that have developed among those participating in the recovery workers'
lawsuits. Given the fact that some cancers are slower to develop than
others, it seems likely to several doctors and epidemiologists that many
more reports of cancer and serious lung illnesses will surface in the
months and years to come. The fact that 8,500 recovery workers have
already banded together to sue, only five years later—with 400 total
cancer patients among their number—leads many experts to predict that
these figures are likely to grow, meaning a possible death toll in the
thousands.
In many ways, these illnesses suggest the slow but deteriorating health
issues that faced the atomic-bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
where thousands died in the years and decades that followed the United
States' use of nuclear weapons. And that similarity has not been lost on
David Worby, the 53-year-old attorney leading the joint-action suits on
behalf of those workers who are already sick, and even dying.
"In the end," Worby declares, "our officials might be responsible for more
deaths than Osama bin Laden on 9-11."
For the rest of the article go to:
http://villagevoice.com/news/0648%2Clombardi%2C75156%2C2.html
|