The Development of Bomb Technology Related to the 9/11 Operation
These outlines of
developments in military bomb technology have been written to give the
layman some idea, why bomb technology has developed into what it is.
A hollow charge
made possible a small charge to make a hole in armour plate was invented
in Switzerland in 1937. A cutting charge, used in the WTC in tens of
thousands of pieces, was an evolunary model of the principles of a hollow
charge from 1950's.
A Claymore threw
steel balls towards the enemy, but was otherwise harmless even from 5
meters distance, was developed in the USA approximately in 1960.
A flank mine is
able to direct a narrow pressure wave through AFV flanks from a distance
of 20 meters and was more developed in Finland around 1970. Due to
efficiency causes, growing part of military explosives deploy improvements
utilizing directed explosion energy.
By controlling several
layers of the explosion fronts the size of a nuclear bomb has been
minimized during the 1960's (fission – implosion). After that, the control
of explosion force in nuclear explosions was developed. Too strong an
explosion is sometimes unusable, for example when the enemy have broken
too close to friendly cities.
While looking for a
bomb with a small size and a strong effect, a pure hydrogen bomb
was an obvious solution. When no atomic device is needed for igniting, the
size of the hydrogen bomb gets even smaller and the yield (effect) can be
set within a wide range, for example between from 1 to 100. This succeeded
in the 1980's, as well as the neutron bomb, which kills only living
things and leaves most material untouched.
The former Soviet Union
is said to have had more than 500 command centers durable for a small
nuke. That led into the developing of different types of bunker busters.
A working solution is a nuclear missile that directs 96% of its yield into
a thin, all penetrating heat+blast wave forward, tunneling hundreds of
meters downwards into solid rock. This type of a hydrogen bomb was
developed somewhere in the early 1990's. Nowadays, both the yield and the
direction of the destructive force of a small tactical hydrogen bomb
can be somewhat controlled. The amount of fusion-able materials control
the yield (effect) and the shape of the charge as well as the initiation
arrangements impress the direction of the explosion wave.
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/soldier3.htm
|