| |
Agents of Influence
By Robert Dreyfuss
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16234.htm
01/20/07 "The
Nation" -- -- Did Ariel Sharon, the
Prime Minister of Israel, run a covert program with operatives in high-level US
government positions to influence the Bush Administration's decision to go to
war in Iraq? The FBI wants to know.
That's the story behind the latest Washington spy scandal, involving Israel, the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and a mid-level civilian
Pentagon employee allegedly caught red-handed trying to deliver US secrets to
the Israelis.
It's not a routine spy case. According to sources familiar with the
investigation, the FBI is looking at a group of neoconservatives who have
occupied senior posts at the White House, the Pentagon and in Vice President
Cheney's office. It's not that they are supporters of Israel--no crime
there--but that some of them might be conspirators in a clandestine operation
launched by Sharon's Likud Party. They make up the very network of
ideologues--from civilians at the Defense Department to fellow travelers at
right-wing think tanks--who have been accused of pushing George W. Bush into
war. The point of the probe, sources believe, is not to examine the push to war
but rather to ascertain whether Sharon recruited or helped place in office
people who knowingly, and secretly, worked with him to affect the direction of
US policy in the Middle East. The most likely targets of the inquiry are Douglas
Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and Harold Rhode of the Pentagon's
Offic!
e of Net Assessment.
It's an explosive inquiry and one that raises the most sensitive hackles, since
it involves the possibility that US officials (most, but not all, Jews) are
working on Sharon's behalf. They include Feith and a handful of other officials,
including those in the inner circle of his policy office who formed the core of
the Office of Special Plans (OSP). The probe faces stiff political resistance.
Yet it may have legs.
The investigation burst into the news in late August when CBS News reported that
the FBI had caught a Feith staffer, later identified as Larry Franklin, trying
to deliver what turned out to be a classified draft of a presidential memo on
Iran to AIPAC and an Israeli Embassy diplomat. Subsequent attention focused
largely on whether Franklin was a spy for Israel, but in fact he is only a minor
figure in a far more sweeping probe that began two years ago.
What triggered the original investigation isn't known, but it is known that it
began at a critical moment, as Feith and Rhode began assembling a team, which
included Franklin, to form the OSP. It's been widely reported that the OSP
manufactured exaggerated intelligence reports on the threat from Iraq, but less
reported is the fact that the OSP also carried out unauthorized operations.
Several OSP officials--including Rhode, Franklin and Michael Maloof, one of the
two original staffers of the forerunner to OSP, joined by Michael Ledeen of the
American Enterprise Institute (AEI)--took part in a rogue Pentagon initiative,
beginning in 2001 with unsavory wheeler-dealers in Rome and Paris, to discuss
regime change beyond Iraq, in Iran and Syria. The CIA found out about the Rome
meeting, and the agency may have asked the FBI to start watching Feith, Rhode,
Ledeen, Franklin et al. Former CIA and Defense intelligence officials familiar
with the case stress that the FBI is looking at!
an operation run by the Israeli prime minister, not by the Mossad, Israel's
intelligence agency, and that the investigation is based solely on concerns
about foreign influence. "It's about Sharon," says a former senior CIA
operations officer. "This has nothing to do with anti-Semitism."
Some familiar with the case suggest that the FBI's investigation is looking back
as far as 1996, when Feith, Richard Perle, Feith's boss at the Pentagon in the
1980s and until recently chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, and
David Wurmser, a co-founder of OSP who is now Cheney's Middle East adviser,
wrote a radical memo, called "A Clean Break," to incoming Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu calling for confrontation with Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and the
PLO.
Since the investigation came to light, Sharon's closest allies have led an
effort to derail it. Screaming the loudest is Marc Zell, Feith's former law
partner, who is now an attorney in Israel tied to the Likud's right wing and to
the settler movement. "It's a cheap shot by certain people inside the government
to embarrass Doug and the Pentagon leadership," Zell told the Philadelphia
Inquirer. "Certain elements inside the military and intelligence communities are
unhappy with the policy decisions of people in the upper echelon and attempt,
sometimes in a very crude way, to embarrass them." News of the investigation
stunned AIPAC, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, AEI and
others in Likud's Washington circuit. And, of course, AIPAC's friends in
Congress are hopping mad. Ha'aretz, the Israeli daily, said that news of the
inquiry landed like the "diplomatic equivalent of an unexploded cluster bomb."
Perle is demanding that the White House clamp down on the investigators,
according to the Boston Globe. "It's pretty nasty, and unfortunately the
Administration doesn't seem to have it under control," the Globe quotes Perle as
saying. But according to the Financial Times, the White House is quietly doing
just that: The London daily reports that the White House is pressuring the FBI
and the Justice Department not to issue indictments in the case.
Other voices are also being heard. Democratic Representative John Conyers wrote
to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee demanding an investigation into
"substantial and credible evidence that Pentagon officials...have engaged in
unauthorized covert activities." Conyers specifically cited Feith. And the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is now deep into phase two of its own
probe, which includes examining the work of the OSP; its report is expected
after the November election.
The FBI has an ace in the hole that may allow it to resist White House pressure.
"By now," says a retired intelligence official, "the FBI has gathered up so much
material in grand jury records and things like that that they are in a position
to push back against pressure from the Administration to back away from this.
When they get pressure, they leak to somebody. And the potential of disclosure
is a real threat to the Administration." In addition, the counterintelligence
probe could spin off investigations in several possibly related scandals,
including the Ahmad Chalabi case and the Valerie Plame leak, not to mention the
Franklin matter.
"They have no case," says AEI's Michael Ledeen. We'll see.
Copyright © 2007 The Nation
|
|