Schematic of positions
of aircraft impacts.
|
 |
|
|
Schematic of location of
blast debris.
Showing the distance that some of the steel columns were located
after the collapse proves that the buildings were brought down by
explosives. This would not happen in any normal structural
collapse. |
 |
|
THERMITE or THERMATE?The first
picture to the section below is clear evidence of some form of high intensity
cutting explosive charge such as thermite or thermate was used. Notice the
considerable amount of solidified molten metal on the central column
behind the man in the centre.
The other Pictures.
For clarification of the other pictures concerning the possibility
that they were cut with arc-welding or similar equipment by the demolition
workers. Check the height that the girders protrude from debris in
relation to the height of the workmen. If they were cut by workmen with
cutting equipment the cut height from the ground would be roughly uniform.
Most of the large girders are cut too high for workmen to have cut them.
Further, they are cut at different angles, and some of them exhibit
thermite or similar traces of high intensity cutter explosives. Another
factor for consideration is safety; it would have been potentially
lethally dangerous for workmen to cut the girders protruding from the
debris. They would not know where they would crash and the rebound of
debris pieces could have seriously injured or killed others.
Therefore this is clear photographic evidence
of what appears to be thermite or thermate-cut columns, proving military-style planning of the
destruction of the Twin Towers. The installation of the thermite or
thermate charges throughout the entire structures of the two buildings
would have required a well orchestrated army of more than a hundred
specialist demolition experts to install. |
Thermite or Thermate cut columns?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
More photos to
be added
when found. |
|
THE AFTER EFFECTS OF PARTICLE BEAM
WEAPON OR PYROCLASTIC FLOW - OR OTHER DEVICE?
The following text was extracted from
the site hyperlinked at the paragraph.
"Pyroclastic flows such as the WTC dust cloud
must expand primarily by thermal heating. He reduced the
calculated expansion volume by 33%, to account for turbulent mixing
with surrounding air. Hoffman shows that even after this
correction, the pyroclastic flow from the North Tower collapse
expanded to approximately three times the original volume of the
tower. According to Hoffman, this expansion is due to either
heating of the air mass within the towers, or boiling of the water
contents of the concrete. However, the Kingdome demolition also
generated a vast dust cloud, although only ordinary demolition
charges were used. I've undertaken a preliminary and
inconclusive photogrammetric analysis of the Kingdome demolition
here."
|
|
| The first picture to the
right shows tell-tale burning of the cars to the left and on the ground
around them, but not in the middle of the road, where the pieces of paper
are not burnt. There are two further burn marks on the ground to the
right. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
More photos to
be added
when found. |
|
|
| |
Pyroclastic Flow was a telltale
sign of controlled demolition
Pyroclastic flow is defined on
the US Geological Survey website as a ground hugging avalanche of
hot gas and debris. The cauliflower-shaped debris clouds observed
during the collapse of the WTC buildings on 09/11/01 were telltale
signs of a pyroclastic flow. These phenomenon are typically visible
only during volcanic eruptions and controlled demolition of
buildings.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1381525012075538113
|
| |
The photos below right were all
taken about two
months after the crimes at the WCT complex.
|
|
|
There is clearly something very wrong about
them, and similar to the two photos in the section below, taken in the
last phase of the cleanup, as well as the pictures above under the title "Thermite
or Thermate?" The connection between them is the phenomenal amount of
red-brown, dark
brown, dark grey to black
powder. This never takes place
following any form or type of structural building collapse damage.
A further note should be added relating to the relatively small fires
burning in each of the Twin Towers prior to their destruction. In
any conventional structural collapse small fires would be quickly
quenched by oxygen deprivation. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
Photos in Last Phase of Cleanup.
A. Shows a line of
police waiting for the bulldozers
to drop debris for them to check for body parts. B.
Shows police looking
for body parts using brooms or garden rakes.
Notice the very fine dark brown to black dust falling from the two
bulldozer buckets. There is a lot of this fine dust in the piles. Could it
be the residue from particle beam weaponry? |
A.
|
B.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Landing Wheel - What
Type?
WTC-Schematic of location of landing gear.
The four photos to the right were taken at the same location at the
corner of West Street and Rector Street. Photos "A" & "B" were taken
shortly after the destruction of the Twin Towers, hence the debris.
Photos "C" & "D" were taken after cleanup at slightly different
angles. But curiously, they have replaced the first wheel with
a different one - from another aircraft. Why? |
A.
|
B. Landing gear found at the corner
of West & Rector Streets. This photo was taken on 9/11.
|
C. Landing gear found at the corner
of West & Rector Streets. This photo was taken after cleanup.
|
D. The same as photo "b"
taken at different angle. Photos "a" and "b" are the same location,
but the wheels are different.
|
|
|
Intense heat and bright flashes indicate
[mini] nuclear explosions
The aftermath of the twin towers demolition
reveals a heat source which is not even addressed by the official 911
Commission's report.
Video tape shows bright explosive
flashes. Nearby cars are turned into charred wrecks but not crushed by
falling debris. A military expert in Finland concludes that small nuclear
devices were involved in the destruction of the twin towers.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4731051210315608217
Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons:
Military effectiveness and collateral
effects
by Andre
Gsponer
Independent Scientific Research Institute, Box 30,
CH1211, Geneva12, Switzerland
May 23, 2006
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0510/0510071.pdf
The paper
begins with a general introduction and update to Fourth Generation Nuclear
Weapons (FGNW), and then addresses some particularly important military
aspects on which there has been only limited public discussion so far.
These aspects concern the unique military characteristics of FGNWs which
make them radically different from both nuclear weapons based on previous
generation nuclear explosives and from conventional weapons based on
chemical explosives: yields in the 1 to 100 tons range, greatly enhanced
coupling to targets, possibility to drive powerful shaped charge jets and
forged fragments, enhanced prompt radiation effects, reduced collateral
damage and residual radioactivity, etc.
|
|
Relics saved from Ground Zero,
stored in Hangar 17 at the JFK Airport.
The photos show that immense heat was
created to bend such massive steel girders, without an, fracture
marks in the bend.
The last one, which they call the
meteor, also indicates high temperatures in its compression.
Further pictures can be found at:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/hanger17.html
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Links added -
1st December 2006:
|
| |
|
The original WTC Master Plan can be found at this website:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/masterplan/index.html
Surviving WTC Evidence
Eyewitness Reports, Photos, and Other Evidence of the WTC Attack
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/surviving.html
|
